What happens if they legalize weed




















More broadly, the legalization movement falls into a broader shift against the harsh criminal justice policies that came out of the war on drugs. And, of course, some people just want to be able to toke up without the government getting in the way. Opponents of legalization worry that fully allowing recreational marijuana use would make pot far too accessible and, as a result, expand its use and misuse.

Among alcohol users, for instance, the top 10 percent of users consume, on average , more than 10 drinks each day. Marijuana users exhibit similar patterns. For the marijuana industry, that makes the heaviest users the most lucrative customers.

But I think we have a horrible history of dealing with these kinds of things. Drug policy experts say there are alternatives to commercial legalization, like putting state governments in charge of marijuana production and sales, which could tame the for-profit incentive and give states more direct control over prices and who buys pot. But legalization opponents worry that any move toward legalization will inevitably attract powerful for-profit forces, especially since the marijuana industry has already taken off in several states.

When I look at how things are set up in states like Colorado, where the marijuana industry gets a seat at the table for every state decision on marijuana policy, it troubles me. Given these concerns, opponents favor more limited reforms than legalization.

Other critics of legalization support legalizing marijuana for medical purposes but not recreational use. SAM, for instance, broadly agrees that current drug and criminal justice policies are far too punitive and costly. But while they may support some reforms, they feel that legalization simply goes too far — and could lead to worse consequences than the alternatives. In total, millions of people across the US report wanting to quit marijuana and being unable to despite negative consequences.

The most thorough review of the research yet, from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine , linked marijuana use to a variety of other potential downsides, including respiratory issues if smoked , schizophrenia and psychosis , car crashes, lagging academic and other social achievements, and lower birth weight if smoked during pregnancy. The studies reviewed also suggest it carries several benefits, particularly for chronic pain, multiple sclerosis, and chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.

The National Academies report emphasized that more research is needed, with a lot of unknowns remaining about marijuana use and its effects. For one, the research has yet to prove if all the problems correlated with cannabis use are actually caused by pot.

After all, correlation is not causation. According to surveys from Gallup , support for legalization rose from 12 percent in to 31 percent in to 66 percent in The Pew Research Center found that support varies from generation to generation, although it has been rising among all age groups over the past few years.

As it stands, more than two-thirds of millennials back legalizing marijuana, while support is lower among older groups. The change in public opinion is part of a broader pushback against punitive criminal justice policies and the war on drugs in general. A Pew survey found 63 percent of Americans agree states should move away from harsh mandatory minimum sentences for nonviolent drug crimes, and 67 percent said drug policy should focus more on providing treatment over prosecuting drug users.

Instead, Americans are broadly fed up with drug and criminal justice policies that have contributed to higher incarceration rates while doing little to solve ongoing drug crises. Even as several states and Washington, DC, allow marijuana, the federal government still strictly prohibits pot. That classification puts marijuana in the same category as heroin and a more restrictive category than schedule 2 drugs like cocaine and meth.

The big distinction between schedule 1 and 2 substances, instead, is whether the federal government thinks a drug has medical value. The DEA says schedule 2 substances have some medical value and schedule 1 substances do not, so schedule 1 drugs receive more regulatory scrutiny even though they may not be more dangerous.

Those kinds of studies are traditionally required to prove a drug has medical value to the federal government. But these studies are also much more difficult to conduct when a substance is strictly regulated by the federal government as a schedule 1 drug. Congress can also pass legislation to reschedule marijuana, which legalization advocates have been lobbying legislators to do for decades. The Trump administration suggested it would take a tougher line under Attorney General Jeff Sessions, but current Attorney General William Barr backed off the tougher approach and said he would more or less go back to the Obama-era policies.

Many state-legal marijuana businesses, for instance, must function as cash-only enterprises , since many banks are nervous about dealing with businesses that are essentially breaking federal law.

One concern here is whether the federal government would be in violation of international law if it legalized marijuana. A host of international treaties explicitly ban the legalization of marijuana sales for recreational purposes. As states have legalized, the US has argued that it remains in good standing of these treaties by keeping pot illegal at the federal level.

But that would change if Congress and the president legalized marijuana. As many military and clearance holders are always on call, the federal government will need to figure out what rules to put into place to limit use and to ensure that people are not under the influence of marijuana in the workplace and while possessing a firearm or working in a classified setting.

The next big hurdle will be figuring out how to test whether an individual is under the influence of marijuana at any given time. There is a reasonable expectation that security clearance adjudications will change if marijuana is legalized. While most applications ask about illegal drug use in the past seven years, admitting to marijuana use will not result in a definite denial.

Agencies consider frequency of use and recency. If marijuana is legalized, the drug could be dropped from the application. It is more likely that there will still be a marijuana question, just as there are questions related to alcohol.

The adjudicator will likely still consider frequency and recency, but the standard will be much friendlier that it currently is. The use of the word piecemeal.

It should be significant to any military or security clearance attorney to hear a Supreme Court Justice use the word piecemeal when describing the policy of the federal government.

Often, a security clearance attorney will argue on appeal that the lower decision in a security clearance matter was reached using a piecemeal approach. A Supreme Court Justice does not use such a word without meaning behind it. Why is marijuana still illegal?

There are a number of reasons why marijuana is still illegal. When considering gun rights and marijuana, the government is likely concerned that the drug is mind-altering. They are of the well-supported position that nobody should be in possession of a firearm while under the influence of a mind-altering drug of any type.

If this is their position, then it is logical to believe that the federal government will never allow marijuana use within the military ranks. Legalizing marijuana does not necessarily mean they have to allow service members to use it. Reduce harm The criminalization of marijuana use disproportionately harms young people and people of color, sponsors massive levels of violence and corruption, and fails to curb youth access. Create jobs Legalizing and regulating marijuana will bring one of the nation's largest cash crops under the rule of law.

This will create jobs and economic opportunities in the formal economy instead of the illicit market. Save money Scarce law enforcement resources will be better used to ensure public safety while reducing corrections and court costs. State and local governments would acquire significant new sources of tax revenue from regulating marijuana sales.

Promote consumer safety Marijuana product testing is becoming a standard requirement for legalized marijuana markets. This means consumers are better informed about the marijuana they use. Marijuana Legalization and Regulation. Marijuana Facts.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000